Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10569 (MAD)

Saravanan v. The Commissioner of Police

CRL OP/8835/2026 · 2026-04-08

M Nirmal Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 8835 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR CRL OP No. 8835 of 2026 Saravanan S/o. Shanmugasundaram, 02/243, Barathi Nagar 2nd Street, Villivakkam, Chennai-600 049. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Commissioner of Police Office of Commissioner of Police Chennai, 132, EVK Sampath Salai, Periamet, Vepery, Park Town, Chennai-600 007. 2. The Assistant Commissioner of Police Villivakkam Range, No.204, MTH Road, Villivakkam, Chennai-600 049. 3. The Inspector of Police V1 Villivakkam Police Station, 202, Chennai Tiruvallur High Road, Konnur, Chennai-600 049. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: The criminal original petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS 2023, to direct the respondents to not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry and follow the due process of law. For Petitioner(s): Mr. Jagadeshwaran. B.S. For Respondent(s): Mr.LEONARD ARUL JOSEPH SELVAM Additional Public Prosecutor https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 8835 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER This criminal original petition has been filed to direct the respondents to not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry and follow the due process of law. 2.The case of the petitioner is that he is running a street food stall named Selvi Tiffin Centre, in Villivakkam Chennai. Though the petitioner has no pending criminal cases and has been acquitted from all the previous cases. The Respondent police is harassing the petitioner regularly by visiting his house at frequent intervals and threatening him to execute a bond under Section 129 of BNSS. Hence, the present petition. 3.When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner is a history sheeter in H.S.No.22 of 2025 and he is having four previous cases. 4.Since the petitioner is a history sheeter, he had been called to execute a bond and further, it is also seen that now, General Elections are around the corner and calling the petitioner for executing a bond cannot be termed as harassment. Accordingly, the criminal original petition is dismissed. 08-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No sms https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 8835 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 To 1. The Commissioner of Police Office of Commissioner of Police Chennai, 132, EVK Sampath Salai, Periamet, Vepery, Park Town, Chennai-600 007. 2. The Assistant Commissioner of Police Villivakkam Range, No.204, MTH Road, Villivakkam, Chennai-600 049. 3. The Inspector of Police V1 Villivakkam Police Station, 202, Chennai Tiruvallur High Road, Konnur, Chennai-600 049. 4. The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 8835 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J. sms CRL OP No. 8835 of 2026 08-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis