Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10567 (JHR)

MANTU PRASAD YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF JHARKHAND

WPC/128/2026 · 2026-01-15

Sri Ananda Sen

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:964 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 128 of 2026 ------ Mantu Prasad Yadav, aged about 33 years, son of Suresh Mahto, Resident of Village-Manjhtar, PO-Upper Bahiyar, PS-Karon, District-Deoghar, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through its Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, office at Project Building, Dhurwa, PO-Dhurwa, PS-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 2. The Secretary, Revenue, Registration and Land Reforms Department, Government of Jharkhand, office at Project Building Dhurwa, PO-Dhurwa, PS-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. The Deputy Secretary, Revenue, Registration and Land Reforms Department, Government of Jharkhand, office at Project Building Dhurwa, PO-Dhurwa, PS-Dhurwa, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4. The Deputy Commissioner, Dumka, PO + PS-Dumka, District- Dumka, Jharkhand. 5. The Settlement Officer, Santhal Pargana Division, Dumka, PO + PS-Dumka, District-Dumka, Jharkhand. 6. The Director, Shiva Protection Force (P) Limited, Shop No. F- 9 Housing Board Marketing Complex, Argora, PO + PS- Argora, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. … … Respondent(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ranjan Prasad Ram, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Rahul Saboo, GP-II Mr. K.C. Suman, AC to GP-II ------ 14/ 15th January, 2026 1. Heard the parties. 2. The petitioner prays for quashing the order dated 19.02.2025, issued by Shiva Protection Force (P) Limited, whereby the services of the petitioner has been terminated. 3. Admittedly, the petitioner is an employee of Shiva Protection Force (P) Limited. The Government was taking manpower services from the Shiva Protection Force (P) Limited and the petitioner was one of the person who has been placed in the Settlement Office by Shiva Protection Force (P) Limited. 2026:JHHC:964 2 4. Admittedly, there is no employer-employee relationship between this petitioner and the Government and the petitioner admittedly is the employee of Shiva Protection Force (P) Limited which is evident from Annexure-9 which is the termination letter. 5. The Shiva Protection Force (P) Limited is not a State within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution. Even if the petitioner is terminated on the instruction of State, since the order of termination is by the employer who is not a State, the petitioner cannot maintain this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution. He has to avail other remedy available to him. Thus, this writ petition is not maintainable, accordingly the same is dismissed. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 15.01.2026 S.K.D., cp2 Uploaded on 16.01.2026