Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10564 (ALL)

DINESH KUMAR KAUSHIK v. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY PANCHAYATI RAJYA AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/15910/2026 · 2026-09-29

Dinesh Pathak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15910 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel representing State-respondents and perused the record on board. 2. This writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following reliefs: "(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to issue pension, gratuity and other retiral benefits to the petitioner within the time as prescribed by this Hon'ble Court. (b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No.2 Nagar Panchayat, Dasna, Ghaziabad through its President to decide the representation dated 15.06.2026 within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Sri Yashvant Singh, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State- respondent No. 1 has contended that the grievance of the present petitioner for release of pension, gratuity, etc., as raised in the instant writ petition can be more appropriately redressed by the Executive Officer (respondent No. 3), and he has no objection, in case, a direction is issued for expeditious disposal of a fresh representation to be moved by the petitioner within such stipulated period as may be directed by this Court. 4. In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this matter pending. Therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without making any observation on the merits of the case, with liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the Executive Officer (respondent No. 3), to ventilate his grievance, as averred in the present writ petition, within a period of three weeks from today, along with a certified copy of this order and a self Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satyendra Narayan Singh, Tarun Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Dinesh Kumar Kaushik .....Petitioner(s) Principal Secretary Panchayati Rajya And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) attested copy of the present writ petition, and, in turn, he shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably, within a period of three months from the date of production of such representation. 5. With the aforesaid observation, present writ petition is disposed of. September 30, 2026 vinay WRIA No. 15910 of 2026 2 (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad