1 / 3 2026:CGHC:18225 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 535 of 2025 Ramawtar Tiwari S/o Late Balakdas Tiwari Aged About 63 Years R/o H/3, Gayatri Vila Parisar, Near Maharishi Vidya Mandir, Mangla, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, 495001 ... Petitioner versus 1 - Shri Kamalpreet Singh Secretary, Public Works Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh, (Contemnors) 2 - Shri Vijay Kumar Bhatpahri Engineer-In- Chief, Public Works Department (Chhattisgarh), Nirman Bhavan, North Block, Sector-19, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Shri Santosh Kumar Kori Chief Engineer, Public Works Department, Bridge Division, Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Shri M. L. Uikey (Manak Lal Uikey) Superintending Engineer, Public Works Department, Bridge Construction Division, Raigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.) 5 - Shri R. K. Verma (Ramesh Kumar Verma) Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Bridge Division, District- Raigarh (C.G.) ALFIZA BAIG Digitally signed by ALFIZA BAIG Date: 2026.04.22 14:35:43 +0530 2 / 3 6 - Shri Anil Tirkey Divisional Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts And Pensions, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur, District-Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 7 - Smt. Jyoti Singh District Treasury Officer, District Treasury, Raigarh, District- Raigarh (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Shalvik Tiwari, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Garry Mukhopadhyay, Additional Advocate General S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 21.04.2026 1. Learned counsel for the State submits that the representation submitted by the petitioner has been considered and decided as directed by this Court and is disposed off observing that there is no difference in the pension and gratuity amount. The decision is communicated to the petitioner vide letter dated 20.04.2026. He places before this Court the copy of letter dated 20.04.2026 for perusal of this Court and other available documents as also handed over the said letter to counsel for the petitioner. 2. The direction in the order, subject matter of contempt is to consider and take decision on the representation submitted by petitioner. 3. In the aforementioned facts and circumstances of the case, in the opinion of this court, respondents – contemnors have complied the order, and therefore, contempt proceedings initiated against the respondents is hereby dropped. 3 / 3 4. Notices discharged. 5. Contempt petition closed. Certified copy as per rules. sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Alfiza