RUPALI TRIPATHI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/15970/2026 · 2026-09-29
Manju Rani Chauhan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10554 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10554 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15970 of 2026 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Shresth Pratap Singh,
learned counsel for respondent-BSA and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent. The petitioners have preferred the instant writ petition for a direction upon respondents to pay House Rent Allowance to the petitioners at the rate payable to the employees of the Varanasi City in the light of the judgement rendered by Full Bench of this Court in the case of Uma Shankar Singh and others vs. State of U.p. and others reported in 2015(8) ADJ 741 and a further prayer to direct the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioners dated 11.12.2025 in the light of the aforesaid judgement.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have approached the authority concerned by moving representations for ventilation of their grievance. However, no heed has yet been paid.
Learned counsel for the respondent-BSA submits that the observations made in the case of Uma Shankar Singh (supra) are not applicable to the facts of the present case. However, in case fresh representations are moved by the petitioners, individually, before the authorities concerned for redressal of their grievances, the same shall be considered in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pushkar Kushwaha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shresth Pratap Singh Rupali Tripathi And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
the petitioners, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that the petitioners may make fresh applications/representations, individually, ventilating all their grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.3, Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Mirzapur, within three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.3 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. September 30, 2026 Rahul.
WRIA No. 15970 of 2026 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAHUL GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad