Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10551 (AP)

Bollam Seshagiri Rao v. Sri. G.Sai Prasad. IAS.,

CC/2316/2026 · 2026-09-10

V Sujatha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010178032026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2316/2026 Between: 1. BOLLAM SESHAGIRI RAO, , S/B ABADDAM, AGED 48 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, FLAT NO 202, PRIDES VIRGO CLASSICS AVENUE, NEAR SYNDICATE BANK, RING ROAD, VIZIANAGARANN, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI G SAI PRASAD IAS, PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELBGAPUDI,GUNTUR DIST- 522 238. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, 2ND BLOCK, 1ST FLOOR, ROOM NO.287, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS. VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DIST - 522 238. 3. SRI NARASIMHA MURTHY IAS, ENGINEER IN CHIEF, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST-533 125. 4. SMT C NAGARANI IAS, DISTRICT COLLECTOR. WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT NIDADAVOLE - 534 301. 5. SRI P NAGARJUNA RAO, SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, BHIMAVARAM - 534 201. 6. SRI CH V V S SATYANARAYANA, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DRAINAGE DIVISION, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DIST - 534 2 201. 7. SRI P SUBRAHMANYAM, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, G.W. DIVISION. NIDADAVOLE, WEST GODAVARI DIST - 534 301. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the above contemners / respondents under the provisions of contempt of courts Act, for their wilfully disobeying the orders of Hon'ble Justice issued in WP No. 26868 of 2024, dated 15-10-2025 and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K L N SWAMY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.26868 of 2024, dated 15.10.2025. The operative portion of the said order is extracted hereunder: “…..this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to release the amounts to the petitioner in accordance with quality control certificates i.e., dated 31.05.2024 for a sum of Rs.4,43,091/-, dated 15.06.2024 for a sum of Rs.6,11,016/-, dated 19.06.2024 for a sum of Rs.5,56,485/-, dated 19.06.2024 for a sum of Rs.7,16,419/- and 15.07.2024 for a sum of Rs.15,96,353/- issued by the respondents, within a period of five (5) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order….” 2. Today when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the respondents/contemnors furnished a copy of Letter No.FIN01- FMU0MISC/350/2022(1778130), dated 11.09.2026, issued by the 2nd respondent, wherein it is stated that the Finance Department has received the following bills in respect of the present contempt case and the same have been cleared. The details are as follows: Bill No. Net amount (Rs.) Payment Status 2026-71438383 17,80,119/- Cleared on 11.09.2026 2026-71367733 7,98,890/- Cleared on 11.09.2026 2026-71397387 6,81,354/- Cleared on 11.09.2026 2026-71367009 6,20,545/- Cleared on 11.09.2026 2026-71441581 4,63,902/- Cleared on 11.09.2026 4 3. Therefore, learned counsel for the respondents/contemnors requested this Court to close the contempt case. 4. Recording the above submissions and, in view of the fact that the amounts have been cleared by the respondents in favour of the petitioner, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 11.09.2026 KGR