Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10547 (JHR)

PUJA KUMARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1952/2026 · 2026-03-13

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:6922 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1952 of 2026 Puja Kumari, Age-26 yrs., W/o Late Rajesh Kumar Mahatha, R/o Vill.- Koymara, P.O.-Udnabad, P.S.-Giridih Muffsile, Dist.- Giridih (Jharkhand) ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite party -- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN -- For the Petitioner(s) : Ms. Lina Shakti, Advocate For the State : Mr. Naveen Kr. Gaunjhu, A.P.P --- 02/13.03.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The Petitioner has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Adityapur P.S. Case No. 228/2025, registered for the offence under Sections 103/238/3(5) of B.N.S., 2023, pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case due to land dispute. She further submits that no incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. She further submits that petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and she is languishing in jail since 21.07.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned A.P.P opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that there is direct and specific allegation against this petitioner; as such, she does not deserve grant of regular bail. 5. Having regard to the allegation made against the petitioner as well as gravity of the offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail, at this stage. Accordingly, her prayer for bail is rejected. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 13th March, 2026 jk Uploaded on 17 /03/2026