M/s Surya Infrastructures Kakinda v. Sri S. Suresh Kumar
CC/4081/2025 · 2026-09-17
Harinath N
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10547 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10547 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010688382025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE 18th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4081/2025 Between:
1. M/S SURYA INFRASTRUCTURES KAKINDA, REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, AND CONTRACTOR .YALLA SURYA CHAKRAVARTHI S/O YALLAVENKATA RAMAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/OYALLAVARISTREET, CINEMA ROAD, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DIST.
...PETITIONER AND
1. SRI S SURESH KUMAR, S/O NOT KNOWN AGED ABOUT MAJOR,WORKING AS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VERAG'APUDI,AMARAVATI.
2. SRI SHAN MOLHAN SAGILI, S/O NOT KNOWN AGED ABOUT MAJOR,WORKING AS DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
KAKINADA DISTRICT, KAKINADA.
3. S SRI N V V SATYANARAYANA, S/O NOT KNOWN AGED ABOUT MAJOR,WORKING AS MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, KAKINADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION,
KAKINADA TOWN, KAKINADA DISTRICT.
4. SRI S MATSYA RAJU, S/O NOT KNOWN AGED ABOUT MAJOR,WORKING AS EXECUTIVE
ENGINEER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT
5. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, S/O NOT KNOWN AGED ABOUT MAJOR,WORKING AS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, STATE OF
ANDHRA PRADESH FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to issue summons under section 10 to 12, 15 and 16 of Contempt of Courts Act. 1971 to punish the respondents for willfull violation of orders of this Honble court made in WP No 22859 of 2024 dt 24/07/2025 and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. BOKKA SATYANARAYANA KAMLA Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. M Krishna Rao SC for skl vzm kkd Municipal Corporations
2. SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI
3.
The Court made the following order: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the orders of this Court have been complied with.
Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 18.09.2026 RJS/GCD
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
C.C.NO:4081 of 2025
Dt: 18.09.2026
RJS/GCD