Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10544 (RAJ)

ISLAMUDDIN S/O SHRI RAFIK MOHAMMAD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/11120/2026 · 2026-07-20

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:27702] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11120/2026 URN: CRLMB / 20564U / 2026 1. Islamuddin S/o Shri Rafik Mohammad, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Hiraman Ji Kabe Ka Chowk, Brahmpuri, Bundi, Police Station Kotwali, District Bundi (Raj.) (The Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In District Jail Bundi). 2. Najim Hussain S/o Shri Rafik Mohammad, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Hiraman Ji Kabe Ka Chowk, Brahmpuri, Bundi, Police Station Kotwali, District Bundi (Raj.) (The Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In District Jail Bundi). 3. Nasir Hussain S/o Shri Rafik Mohammad, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Hiraman Ji Kabe Ka Chowk, Brahmpuri, Bundi, Police Station Kotwali, District Bundi (Raj.) (The Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In District Jail Bundi). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. SK Gupta, Sr. Adv. assisted by Ms. Surabhi Agarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP Mr. Deepak Pareek HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 20/07/2026 1. The petitioners have preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.68/2023 registered at Police Station Kotwali Bundi, District Bundi for offences under Sections 342, 365, 306 and 34 of IPC, 1860. [2026:RJ-JP:27702] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11120/2026] 2. Heard, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that specific allegations against the present petitioners are that the deceased, Waseem, had borrowed a sum of ₹1,00,000 from the petitioners, when the petitioners demanded repayment of the said amount, the deceased returned ₹70,000 and sought some time for repayment of the remaining amount. Thereafter, the deceased-Waseem has committed suicide in which, the petitioners had no immediate connection. It is further submitted that the deceased did not leave behind any suicide note mentioning the names of the petitioners. The petitioners have no active role in the alleged act and they cannot be held solely responsible for the unfortunate incident. Petitioners are behind the since 12.04.2026 without any criminal past. Charge-sheet has already been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. [2026:RJ-JP:27702] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11120/2026] 6. Consequently, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Islamuddin S/o Shri Rafik Mohammad, Najim Hussain S/o Shri Rafik Mohammad and Nasir Hussain S/o Shri Rafik Mohammad be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that each of them shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/48