Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010624162018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] MONDAY, THE 21st DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 2315/2018 Between:
1. B LAKSHMI, W/O. LATE M BALAJI, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, HINDU, RIO. DOOR NO. 25/559-100, OLD PRASANTH NAGAR, CPI COLOONY, CHITTOOR TOWN AND DIST
...APPELLANT AND
1. M/S SDM LOGISTICS, PRIPRIETOR, MR MAJEET SINGH, AT SARGAKA RASTA, BEHIND PRINCE VATAK, OPP. SECTOR V, WARD NO. 14, PETROL PUMP, GURGAON, STATE OF HARYANA.
2. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD, REP BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, OFFICE AT REGD. OFFICE ORIENTAL HOUSE, 25/27, ASAFALI ROAD, NEW DELHI 110 002
3. MOHAMMAD HANEEF, S/O. A S MOHAMMAD, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/O. AT DHANA VILLAGE, TEHSILFTUR,JHIRKA DISTRICT, METWAT, ARYANA STATE.
4. M/S N P ENTERPRISES PVT LTD, REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, AT 94, TIRUVALLUR SALAI, DINDIGUL 625 001 TAMIL NADU STATE.
5. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD, REP BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, OFFICE AT 1ST FLOOR, LOYOLA BUILDING, DINDIGUL 625 001, TAMIL NADU STATE.
6. K PERIASWAMY, S/O. KANNU, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, HINDU, R/O. PONIAMMAN KOIL STREET, PERIYAKINCHI VILLAGE,
2
TIRUPATHUR TQ, VELLORE DIST. TAMIL NADU STATE
...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal filed under Order 41 of CPC before the High Court may be pleased to set aside the decree and award passed in MVOP No. 28/2016 on the file of IX Additional District Judge Cum Chairman - Motor Accident Claim, Tribunal, Chittoor by allowing the appeal in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Appellant:
1. T C KRISHNAN Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. S A V RATNAM
2. The Court made the following:
3
HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM
MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 2315 OF 2018
JUDGMENT:
Today also there is no representation on behalf of the appellant.
On the last adjournment i.e. on 18.09.2026 also, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. It shows that the appellant has no interest to prosecute the case.
In the result, this Motor Accident Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, the pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM, J Dt:21.09.2026 Vns