[2026:RJ-JP:27932] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8725/2026 URN: CRLMB / 15995U / 2026 Mahipal Singh Rathore S/o Datar Singh, Aged 26 Years, R/o Village Kinsariya, Police Station Parwatsar, District Deedwana Kuchaman. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9285/2026 URN: CRLMB / 17041U / 2026 Ajay Kumar S/o Dharmpal Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o- Village-Lambi Sehad, Police Thana Buhana, Dist.-Jhunjhunu (Raj.), At Present R/o House No. 10, Tara Nagar-C, Lohamandi Road, Police Thana Harmada, Jaipur West. (At Present Accused Applicant Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9524/2026 URN: CRLMB / 17666U / 2026 Pramod Kumawat S/o Gopal Lal Kumawat, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Badi Walo Ki Dhani, Mohanpura Balaji, Kishangarh Renwal, P.S. Kishangarh Renwal District Jaipur Rajasthan At Present Tenant Plot No. 108, Vinayak Vihar-D, Rawan Gate, Ps Kardhani, Jaipur. (Presently Confined At Central Jail Jaipur) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent [2026:RJ-JP:27932] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-8725/2026] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Mr. Brahma Prakash Mr. Susheel Pujari For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 21/07/2026 1. These instant bail applications have been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioners against the orders passed by learned trial Court dated 30.05.2026, 06.06.2026 and 16.06.2026 under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.72/2026 registered at Police Station Jalupura, District Jaipur City (North) for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 318(4), 316(2) & 61(2) of BNS and Section 66D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submit that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case; that the accused-petitioners are in custody since long; that main culprit is co-accused Suraj, who has not been arrested yet; that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners; that co-accused person has already been enlarged on bail; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioners behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the contentions put forth by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioners and submits that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners Ajay Kumar and [2026:RJ-JP:27932] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-8725/2026] Pramod Kumawat but one criminal antecedent is registered against accused-petitioner Mahipal Singh Rathore. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and rival contentions advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties and particularly keeping in view the fact that accused-petitioners are behind the bars since long; that charge-sheet has already been filed; that nothing has been recovered at the instance of the accused-petitioners; that similarly situated co-accused person Rajendra Kumar Bairwa has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 27.05.2026 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7414/2026; that trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, these instant bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners (i) Mahipal Singh Rathore S/o Datar Singh, (ii) Ajay Kumar S/o Dharmpal Singh, and (iii) Pramod Kumawat S/o Gopal Lal Kumawat are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve themselves in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. [2026:RJ-JP:27932] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-8725/2026] 7. The accused-petitioners are also directed to submit thier present addresses along with mobile numbers to the concerned SHO/IO within three days of release and the concerned SHO/IO shall verify the said mobile numbers and addresses. In case, the accused-petitioners change their addresses or mobile numbers, they shall submit the same before the concerned SHO/IO and also before the concerned learned Trial Court. The accused-petitioners are further directed to submit to the concerned SHO/IO, a comprehensive list of all electronic devices in thier possession, including mobile phones, laptops, tablets, external hard disks and pen drive along with their IMEI numbers and serial numbers within three days of release under this bail order. 8. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 9. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of these instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 10. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court, Jail authorities and SHO through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 47-49/SHIVANI