- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9296 RP No. 330 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM REVIEW PETITION NO.330 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SMT.LAKSHMI K W/O K.V.KRISHNA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.36 2ND CROSS, THIMMAREDDY COLONY JEEVAN BHEEMANAGARA BENGALURU - 560 075 …PETITIONER (BY SRI.NAVEED AHMED, ADVOCATE SRI.L.SRINIVAS BABU, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI.R.S.YERRAPPA S/O LATE SANNALINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS R/AT NO.749, 3RD BLOCK RAJAJINAGAR BENGALURU - 560 010. 2. SRI.JAYARAMA REDDY S/O LATE SANNALINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS R/O RAJAVANTHI, PAVAGADA TALUK TUMAKURU DISTRICT - 561202 3. SMT.R.S.NINGAMMA W/O SRI LAKSHMAN AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS Digitally signed by AL BHAGYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9296 RP No. 330 of 2025 4. SMT.ESHWARAMMA W/O SRI.RAMAKRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS 5. SMT.NAGAMANI W/O SRI.NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS 6. SMT.SAKAMMA W/O SRI.JAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS RESPONDENT NOS.3 TO 6 ARE ALL RESIDENTS OF C/O JAYARAMA REDDY R/O RAJAVANTHI PAVAGADA TALUK TUMAKURU DISTRICT-561202 …RESPONDENTS THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 R/W SEC.114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE JUDGMENT DATED 02.07.2025 PASSED IN RFA NO.1516/2025 ON THE FILE OF THIS HONBLE COURT AND ALLOW THIS REVIEW PETITION WITH COSTS AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM ORAL ORDER Heard learned counsel appearing for the review petitioner. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9296 RP No. 330 of 2025 2. On perusal of the grounds urged in the review petition, this Court is of the view the review petitioner under the garb of seeking review of the order is seeking a re-hearing. 3. The grounds urged in the review petition were substantially canvassed, addressed and dealt by this Court and therefore. The question of permitting review petitioner to re-agitate the grounds, which were not acceded to while deciding the appeal, does not constitute the error apparent on the face and therefore, the requisites ingredients of Order XLVII Rule 1(a) of CPC are not made out. Accordingly, the review petition stands dismissed. Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE NBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13