SUDARSHAN TUKARAM TAYDE v. ZILLA PARISHAD, BULDHANA, THR. ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
WP/6551/2026 · 2026-09-23
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10537 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10537 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
32-WP-6551-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 6551 OF 2026 (Sudarshan Tukaram Tayde Vs. Zilla Parishad, Buldhana & Anr.) __________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders. Ms. Nandini Patel h/f Mr. R.B. Dhore, Counsel for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Jadhao h/f Ms. S.S. Jachak, Counsel for respondent no.1. Mr. N.R. Patil, A.G.P. for respondent no.2/State. .....
CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE AND NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ.
SEPTEMBER 23, 2026 The prayer is to direct respondent no.1 – Chief Executive Officer, Buldhana, to take decision pursuant to hearing dated 23/7/2026 pertaining to representations dated 11/2/2025 and 8/9/2025. 2] The Counsel for respondent no.1 submits that decision has been taken on 31/8/2026. The representations are rejected. 3] Thus, the purpose of filing the petition has been served. It’s a different matter that the representations, as made by the petitioner, have been not accepted. The petitioner may avail remedy against the decision as available in law. 4] With the aforesaid observation, the petition is disposed of.
(NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, J.) (ANIL L. PANSARE, J.) Sumit 2026:BHC-NAG:12598-DB Signed by: Mr. Sumit Agrawal Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 23/09/2026 17:02:23