Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10537 (AP)

M/s. YVR AND COMPANY, v. KETAN GARG, IAS

CC/3757/2025 · 2026-09-10

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010652132025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3757/2025 Between: 1. M/S. YVR AND COMPANY,, MANAGING PARTNER, Y.V. RATNAM, S/O. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC. CONTRACTOR, MIGIIA114 GULLALAPALEM COLONY, SRIHARIPURAM VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. KETAN GARG IAS, COMMISSIONER, THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. (R2) 2. P V GANGADHAR RAO, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEEI -III, O/O. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. (R3) 3. PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE SS PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VKAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. (R4) ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to Pleased to direct the notices to the respondents herein and punish the Respondents under Sec. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971 for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Hon'ble High Court dated 06.08.2025 passed in W.P.No. 22203 of 2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI 2. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP) The Court made the following: ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.22203 of 2024, dated 06.08.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case. 2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case. 3. Recording the same, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 11.09.2026 LSP 40 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3757/2025 Date: 11.09.2026 LSP