[2026:RJ-JP:27117] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9176/2026 URN: CRLMB / 16805U / 2026 Vimlesh Devi W/o Lala Harijan, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Dalpura, P.s. Nadauti, District Karauli (Rajasthan) ----Accused-Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Though Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10248/2026 URN: CRLMB / 18995U / 2026 Lala Harijan S/o Khutya, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Dalpura, P.s. Nadauti, District Karauli (Rajasthan). ----Accused-Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anupam Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Gupta, P.P., Mr. Raju Dhakad, ASI Police Station Nadoti, District Karauli HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 16/07/2026 1. The present criminal miscellaneous bail applications have been preferred by the accused-petitioners under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No. 117/2026, registered at Police Station-Nadoti, District Karauli, for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 333, 351(2) of the BNS, 2023. [2026:RJ-JP:27117] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-9176/2026] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that Vimlesh has already been interrogated in compliance of order of this Court. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners also submits that there is no custodial interrogation required. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that no injury has been inflected of any nature against the victim. Therefore, he prays that the anticipatory bail applications may be allowed. 4. The Investigation Officer is present and submitted that already the accused petitioner-Vimlesh has been interrogated there is no further requirement for any custodial interrogation. 5. On being asked about the injuries having been suffered by the victim. Investigation Officer Submits before this Court that the victim has given a written application that he does not want to undergo any medical examination. 6. Learned Public Prosecutor has strongly opposed the bail application. 7. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 8. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, and considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the fact that petitioner Vimlesh has already joined the investigation and has been interrogated in compliance with the order of this Court, the statement of the Investigating Officer that no further custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required, and the fact that the victim declined to undergo medical [2026:RJ-JP:27117] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-9176/2026] examination, this Court is of the opinion that the custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not warranted. Accordingly, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. 8. Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail applications filed by the accused-petitioners under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, are allowed. It is directed that, in the event of the arrest of the accused-petitioners, namely, (i) Vimlesh Devi W/o Lala Harijan and (ii) Lala Harijan S/o Khutya, in connection with FIR No. 117/2026 registered at Police Station Nadoti, District Karauli, they shall be released on bail, provided that each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only), along with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each, to the satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer/Station House Officer, subject to the following conditions: (i) The accused-petitioners shall make himself available for interrogation by the Investigating Officer as and when required and shall cooperate with the investigation; (ii) The accused-petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat, or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing those facts to the Court or to any Police Officer; (iii) The accused-petitioners shall not leave India without the prior permission of the concerned Court; and (iv) The accused-petitioners are further directed not to take undue advantage of the liberty granted to him or misuse the same. It is made clear that any [2026:RJ-JP:27117] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-9176/2026] observations made by this Court in the present bail application are only for the purpose of deciding the instant application and shall not influence or affect the merits of the case during the course of trial. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 107-108/KRATIKA