Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11483 WP No. 30847 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 30847 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
SRI. NARAYAN C. R.
S/O LATE C. RAJAGOPALA RAO, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT ROYAL SHELTER LAYOUT, DEVARACHIKKANAHALLI, BENNERGHATTA ROAD, BANGALORE 560 076. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. SHEETHAL U., ADVOCATE FOR SRI.SHIVANAND, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, BANGALORE.
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, BANGALORE.
3.
THE TAHSILDAR, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, KG ROAD, BANGALORE. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11483 WP No. 30847 of 2025
4.
SMT. SUNITHA B D/O BOREGOWDA W/O RAM MOHAN RAJU, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT NO.10, ASHWATHNARAYANA LAYOUT, J.P.NAGAR, 7TH STAGE, BANGALORE-78. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKAR, AGA FOR R1 TO R3)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 IN RP.472/2023 DATED 02/07/2025 WHICH IS AT ANNEXURE-A AND THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN RA(S) NO.171/2023 DATED 13/10/2023 WHICH IS AT ANNEXURE- B AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11483 WP No. 30847 of 2025
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for respondents Nos.1 to 3. Notice to respondent No.4 is not necessary for the following reasons:
2. Learned Additional Government Advocate has raised a preliminary objection that having regard to the amendment brought to Section 136(1) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, w.e.f., 10.01.2025, the petitioner will have to approach the Karnataka Revenue Appellate Tribunal questioning the impugned order passed by the Deputy Commissioner under Section 136(3) of the Act.
3. Upholding the submissions made by the learned Additional Government Advocate, the writ petition stands dismissed while reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal. However, the respondents are hereby directed not to take any
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11483 WP No. 30847 of 2025 precipitative action for a period of four weeks to enable the petitioner approach the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal.
4. Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today.
5. Office is
directed to return the original documents/certified copies, if any, to the petitioner while retaining a copy of the same for the file. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE GPG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39