Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10529 (KAR)

M/S KRT MITAYI v. UJJIVAN SMALL FINANCE BANK

WP/33803/2024 · 2026-03-23

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16330 WP No. 33803 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 33803 OF 2024 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. M/S. KRT MITAYI, PROPRIETOR CONCERN, PROPRIETOR MR. P. ALAGUVEL PETER, NO.1/395/14, LAYOUT BOSAPUR ROAD, ANNAGAR, DAVANGERE-577 001. 2. MR. P. ALAGUVEL PETER, S/O. MR. PANDENADARA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, NO.1/395/14, LAYOUT BOSAPUR ROAD, ANNAGAR, DAVANGERE-577 001. 3. MRS. SALAVI A.P., W/O. MR. P. ALAGUVEL PETER, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, NO.1/395/14, LAYOUT BOSAPUR ROAD, ANNAGAR, DAVANGERE-577 001. Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16330 WP No. 33803 of 2024 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. K. SHASHIKANTH PRASAD, ADVOCATE) AND: UJJIVAN SMALL FINANCE BANK, LOCAL HEAD OFFICE, GRAPE GARDEN, NO.27, 3RD A CROSS, 18TH MAIN, 6TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560 095. REP. BY AUTHORISED OFFICER. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. FRANCIS XAVIER, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD. 02.03.2024 IN CRL.MISC.NO.699/2023 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DAVANAGERE (ANNX-B) AND GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAY FOR ALL THE FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH CRL MISC.NO. 699/2023 DTD. 02.03.2024 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DAVANAGERE (ANNX-B) AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16330 WP No. 33803 of 2024 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the respondent/bank submits that the loan account is settled. 2. In the light of the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondent/bank, as the loan account is settled, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition. Hence, this Court is passing the following: ORDER i. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. ii. All I.As., in the writ petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE BN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 48