Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10524 (ALL)

FARZANA BEGUM v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/15776/2026 · 2026-09-27

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15776 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. By means of present writ petition, petitioner is claiming Extraordinary Pension, retiral dues and terminal benefits of her husband, who died on 17.1.2002. In this regard, petitioner has already moved a representation before respondent authority. 2. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that since the petitioner has already approached respondent authority, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this writ petition pending. 3. In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent authority to consider and decide the above-mentioned representation filed by the petitioner, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties provided there is no other legal impediment. September 28, 2026 Rishabh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arbaz Khan, Sharad Chand Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Farzana Begum .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad