HARISHANKAR TIWARI S/O GAURISHANKAR TIWARI v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/7398/2026 · 2026-07-22
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10520 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10520 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:28182] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7398/2026 URN: CRLMB / 13468U / 2026 Harishankar Tiwari S/o Gaurishankar Tiwari, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Doma Ahlad, Police Station Dehat Kotwali, District Gonda (Up) (Accused Confined In Sub Jail, Bhawanimandi). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohammed Rahil Kalam For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP Mr. Kishore Singh, SHO, PS Gangdhar, District Jhalawar is present in person HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 22/07/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.90/2026 registered at Police Station Gangdhar, District Jhalawar for offences under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of BNS, 2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation against the present petitioner is that he used the personal Identification Documents (IDs) of other persons and got a firm registered in the name of such persons without their consent. It is submitted that there is an apprehension that the petitioner may misuse the registration of
[2026:RJ-JP:28182] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7398/2026] the above firms for his personal use. None of the transactions or alleged misuse was disclosed from the material available on record. Petitioner is behind the bars since 01.05.2026. Charge- sheet has been filed. The case is exclusively triable by the Magistrate. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Harishankar Tiwari S/o Gaurishankar Tiwari, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J 23/Arun