Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10510 (ALL)

SMT SARITA PANDEY v. BRIJESH KUMAR AGNIHOTRI AND 12 OTHERS

A227/13793/2026 · 2026-09-30

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13793 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This is defendant's petition. 2. The suit filed by plaintiff was dismissed for want of prosecution. An application under Order IX Rule 4 CPC has been filed, which is pending consideration. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of Misc. Case No. 190/74/18. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon court concerned to decide the Misc. Case No. 190/74/18, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. October 1, 2026 (V. S. SINGH) Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajan Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Smt Sarita Pandey .....Petitioner(s) Brijesh Kumar Agnihotri And 12 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad