RAJEEV RAI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/19897/2026 · 2026-09-29
Abdul Shahid, Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10509 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10509 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 19897 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE ABDUL SHAHID, J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following main reliefs:-
"issue an order, direction or writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned First Information Report dated 05.07.2025 (Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition) in Case Crime No. 0282 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 324(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Civil Lines, District Prayagraj. ii) issue an order, direction or writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent Nos.2 and 3 not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of the First Information Report dated 05.07.2025 in Case Crime No. 0282 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 324(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, Police Station Civil Lines, District Prayagraj. iii) issue an order, direction or writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to take any coercive action against the petitioners in pursuance of the First Information Report dated 05.07.2025 in Case Crime No. 0282 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 324(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, Police Station Civil Lines, District Prayagraj."
2. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State submitted that after Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bhupendra Kumar Pandey, Pradeep Kumar Sahu Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Rajeev Rai And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
completion of investigation final report has already been forwarded on 10.07.2026 to the Court concerned. 3. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners submitted and prayed that in the light of the statement given by learned AGA for the State the instant writ petition may be disposed of. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, Mr. Rizwan Ahmad, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State and perused the material available on record. 5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State that the final report has already been forwarded as well as prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners, nothing has left for further adjudication. 6. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of.
September 30, 2026 Atul CRLP No. 19897 of 2026 2 (Abdul Shahid,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad