RAVI KULSHRESTHA @ RAVI KUMAR AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/41979/2026 · 2026-09-29
Samit Gopal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10500 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10500 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 41979 of 2026 Court No. - 76 HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J.
1. List revised.
2. Heard Sri Vishnu Murti Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Bade Lal Bind, learned counsel for the State and perused the records.
3. The present application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed by the applicants- Ravi Kulshrestha @ Ravi Kumar, Rohit Kumar Sharma and Mayank Sikarwar, with the prayer to allow the present application and quash the Non-Bailable Warrant dated 05.08.2026 passed by Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Agra in S.T. No. 513 of 2026 (State Vs. Ravi Kulshrestha and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 146 of 2025, under Sections 75, 127(2), 351(2) B.N.S., Section 66E I.T. Act and Section 3(1)B(1) SC/ST Act, Police Station Cyber Crime, District Agra.
4. After arguments on merits at length, learned counsel for the applicants states that he does not want to press the prayer for quashing of the proceedings and the impugned summoning order. He states that the purpose of the applicants would be served if they are permitted to appear before the trial court within a period of two weeks from today and file a regular bail application.
5. Learned counsel for the State has no objection of aforesaid arguments of
learned counsel for the applicants.
6. In view of the above, the prayer for quashing of proceedings/summoning
order is dismissed as not pressed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shivani Kulshrestha, Vishnu Murti Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ravi Kulshrestha @ Ravi Kumar And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
7. However, in view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and looking to the limited prayer of learned counsel for the applicants it is
directed that if the accused-applicants appear and apply for bail before the court concerned by 14th October 2026 or earlier, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law.
8. Further if the applicants fail to appear by 14th October 2026 or before the court concerned to file a bail application, the trial court shall proceed against them in accordance with law.
9. The present application is disposed of. September 30, 2026 AS Rathore NA528 No. 41979 of 2026 2 (Samit Gopal,J.) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK SINGH RATHOR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad