APHC010150392026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 8674/2026 Between: 1. DELHI RAGHAVAMMA, WIFE OF LATE DELHI KRISHNAMURTHY RESIDING AT KATURIVAPU STREET MACHAVARAM VIJAYAWADA (URBAN) MACHAVARAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH - 520004 VIJAYAWADA. 2. DELHI SRAVANI,, DAUGHTER OF LATE DELHI KRISHNAMURTHY, . RESIDING AT ,31-15-41/1 KATURI VARI STREET NEAR ANJANEYASWAMY TEMPLE ELUM ROAD VIJAYAWADA (URBAN) MACHAVARAM VIJAYAWADA (URBAN) KRISHNA DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH- 520004 3. BOLIGARLA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O GAGARAO , RESIDING AT 191/SRT. MA KHADER, SRNAGAR, S RNAGAR, AMEERPET, HYDERABAD, SANJEEV REDDY NAGAR, TELEGANA- 500038, ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT 522238 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA CITY, VIJAYAWADA 520004 3. THE SHO, MACHAVARAM POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA CITY 4. DELHI GEETHA MADHURI, W/O GAMPA PRAMOD, D/O 21-9-67 U.V NARASARAJU VEDHI, MADHURANAGAR, VIJAYAWADA - 520011. 5. GAMPA PRAMOD, S/O SIVA KOTIAH. D/O 21-9-67 U.V NARASARAJU 2 VEDHI, MADHURANAGAR, VIJAYAWADA - 520011 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. GADE NAGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition has been filed for the following relief: <…to issue an appropriate Writ, Order, or Direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents 2 and 3 in interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioners and Respondents 4 and 5 and in repeatedly summoning the petitioners to the police station without any lawful basis as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the Respondents 2 and 3 not to interfere in civil disputes between the petitioners with Respondents 4 and 5, except in accordance with law…= 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader. 3. Mr. Gade Nageswara Rao, learned counsel for the Petitioners, submits that Respondent Nos.2 and 3 are interfering in the civil disputes pending between the Petitioners and Respondent Nos.4 and 5, and are repeatedly summoning the Petitioners to the Police Station. 4. Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader, on written instructions, submits that the Respondent Police have only called the Petitioners to the Police Station for enquiry upon receipt of a complaint, without any coercive intention. He further submits that the police have acted strictly in accordance with law, without interfering in civil disputes or violating the Petitioners’ rights. 3 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and recording the submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing Respondent Nos.2 and 3 not to interfere henceforth in the civil dispute between the Petitioners and Respondent Nos.4 and 5, without following due process of law. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ Dr.Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 09.04.2026 PRA 4 223 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 8674 of 2026 Date: 09.04.2026 PRA