HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 10319 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard, the Learned counsel for the applicants, the Learned counsel for the informant and the Learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicants in Case Crime No.760 of 2026, under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 109(1), 117(2), 3(5) B.N.S., P.S.- Khalilabad, District- Sant Kabir Nagar, with a prayer to enlarge them on anticipatory bail as the applicants apprehend their arrest in the above-mentioned case. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants has contended that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the present case. There are cross versions of the incident. Both sides have received injuries. Five persons from the informant side have received injuries and four persons from the side of the applicants have received injuries. Learned counsel has further submitted that except the injuries sustained by Prince Pratap Singh, none of the injuries were found to be grievous in nature or dangerous to life. Learned counsel has further submitted that the applicants have no criminal history. No charge sheet has been filed as yet. They will cooperate in the investigation and trial, if any, and may be considered for Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shyamu Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Vikas Yadav Lalaram And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) grant of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the informant and the Learned A.G.A. have opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel for the informant has contended that the F.I.R. from the side of the applicants has been lodged after ten days. None of the injured from the applicants' side have received any injury which may be considered to be grievous in nature or dangerous to life. Learned counsel has further submitted that one injured, Prince Pratap Singh, has received a fracture of the nasal bone, which is a grievous injury. Learned counsel for the informant, however, could not point out any criminal antecedents of the applicants. 5. I have considered the submissions made by the Learned counsel for the parties and perused the material brought on the record. 6. There are cross versions. Both the sides claim to have received injuries. In the opinion of the Court, it would not be appropriate to hold which side is the aggressor at the present stage. Except for one injury received by Prince Pratap Singh, none of the injuries have been found to be grievous in nature or dangerous to life. The injury received by Prince Pratap Singh has an underlying nasal bone fracture which, although grievous in nature, cannot be termed to be dangerous to life. 7. Taking into account all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it fit to enlarge the applicants on anticipatory bail. 8. In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application of the applicants is allowed. 9. In the event of the arrest of the applicants Lalaram and Vijay, they shall be released forthwith in the aforesaid case crime on anticipatory bail NABAIL No. 10319 of 2026 2 on furnishing a personal bond and surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station/Court concerned with the following conditions:- i. the applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; ii. that the applicants shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; iii. that the applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court; iv. that the applicants shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witness; 10. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the Court concerned shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. 11. It is made clear that observations made hereinabove are exclusively for deciding the instant anticipatory bail application and are not to be considered to be an opinion on the merits of the case. October 1, 2026 Sachin NABAIL No. 10319 of 2026 3 (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad