[2026:RJ-JP:26954] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10601/2026 URN: CW / 23388U / 2026 Dinesh Puri Son Of Shri Sohan Puri, Aged About 41 Years, Resident Of Devli Gaon, Tehsil Devli, District Tonk (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Raj., Through Its Principal Secretary Revenue Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The District Collector, Tonk (Raj.) 3. Tehsildar, Tehsil Todarai Singh, District Tonk (Raj.) 4. Sub Divisional Officer, Todarai Singh, District Tonk (Raj.) 5. Umesh Narayan Son Of Late Ramdev, Aged About 60 Years, Resident Of Todaraisingh, District Tonk (Raj.) 6. Kishan Chandra Nirman Son Of Late Ramdev, Aged About 62 Years, Resident Of Todaraisingh, District Tonk (Raj.) 7. Koshal Kishore Son Of Late Ramdev, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Todaraisingh, District Tonk (Raj.) 8. Murli Manohar Son Of Late Ramdev, Aged About 55 Years, Resident Of Todaraisingh, District Tonk (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikas Sharma for Mr. Ghanshyam Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 15/07/2026 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with following prayer: “It is, therefore, humbly prayed that your Lordships may graciously be pleased to call for the entire record of the case and accept and allow this writ petition by an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof to:- i) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to remove the illegal encroachment made by accused respondents over the land of the petitioner -*bearing Math Mandir Khasra [2026:RJ-JP:26954] (2 of 2) [CW-10601/2026] No. 3905, Bhuteshwar Shri Panch Dashanan Juna Akhada, Todaraisingh, District Tonk and further be pleased to hand over the peaceful possession of the said land to the petitioner. (ii) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to decide the representation dated 07.03.2025 submitted by the petitioner within a stipulated period. (iii) Any other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case may also kindly, be passed in favour of the petitioner. (iv) Cost of the writ petition may kindly be awarded in favour of the petitioner. “ 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied in case, liberty is given to the petitioner to make a representation before the respondent- authority for redressal of his grievances. It is further submitted that the writ petition may be disposed of with directions to the competent authority to decide the same in accordance with law. 3. In view of limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to submit a representation before the Competent Authority. 4. It is made clear that in case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, Competent Authority shall adopt the due procedure of law and shall afford opportunity of hearing to all the interested/aggrieved persons before passing any order. The representation shall be decided by a speaking and reasoned order within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case. (ANAND SHARMA),J 21/NEERU