Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1049 (GAU)

BANANI MAJUMDAR v. NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND ORS

I.A.(Civil)/98/2026 · 2026-01-29

Susmita Phukan Khaund

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010006112026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/98/2026 BANANI MAJUMDAR WIFE OF LATE SUBODH KANTI MAJUMDAR RESIDENT OF LINK ROAD LANE NO 1 HOUSE NO 35 SILCHAR 6 DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM VERSUS NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND ORS HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 3 MIDDLETON STREET KOLKATA AND ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT GS ROAD BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI 05 REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF REGIONAL MANAGER GUWAHATI REGIONAL OFFICE GS ROAD BHANGAGARH GUWAHATI KAMRUP METRO ASSAM 2:AJOY KUMAR DEB SON OF SRI NIKHIL RANJAN DEB RESIDENT OF LINK ROAD LANE NO 6 PO AND PS SILCHAR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM 3:SULAKSHAN BALI SON OF SRI SURAJ BALI CARE OF PREM SINGH LALMATI BELTOLA PS BASHITHA GUWAHTI 29 DISTRICT KAMRUP METRO ASSAM 4:ASHOK DAS SON OF LATE NIBARAN DAS RESIDENT OF LINK ROAD LANE NO 6 PO SILCHAR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSM 5:MONISH KUMAR SON OF SRI RAJENDAR SINGH VILLAGE KAHANU WALA PS PAUNTA SAHIB DISTRICT SIRMOR HIMACHAL PRADESH 6:THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD REPRESENTED BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD OF SHYAMAPRASAD ROAD PO AND PS SILCHAR Page No.# 2/2 CACHAR ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MS P BARUAH, Advocate for the Respondent : , BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER Date : 30.01.2026 Heard learned Counsel Ms. P Baruah for the applicant and Ms. P. Borthakur, learned counsel for the insurance company. 2. This application is filed for withdrawal of the awarded amount vide judgment and order dated 16.05.2025 passed in MAC Appeal No. 176/ 2012, awarding an amount of Rs. 6,20,625/ @9% per annum to the claimants from the date of filing of the petition. It is submitted that one of the claimants, Subodh Kanti Mazumdar has already passed away. 3. I have considered the submissions at the bar. 4. The applicant is hereby allowed to withdraw the compensation if deposited. 5. In terms of the above observation, the interlocutory application stands disposed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant