PRADIP KUMAR SAHA@PRADIP KR SAHA AND ORS v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS
WPA/550/2026 · 2026-04-27
Ravi Krishan Kapur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10486 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10486 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
27.04.2026 In the High Court at Calcutta Item No. 37 Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri Court No.06 Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction SK(AR(CR) Appellate Side
WPA/550/2026
PRADIP KUMAR SAHA@PRADIP KR SAHA AND ORS VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS
Mr. Bikramaditya Ghosh, Mr. Koushik Kumar Roy,
….for the petitioner.
Mr. Arjun Roy Mukherjee, Ms. Deborshi Dhar,
…for the SJDA
Mr. M. Rahman, Mr. Nabankur Paul,
….for the State
Mr. Sougata Banerjee, Adv.
…for the respondent no. 3
1. The order dated 21 April, 2026 stands modified to dispense with the presence of the respondent no. 3 who also happens to be the concerned District Magistrate, Darjeeling.
2. The grievance of the petitioners is
directed against inaction of the respondent authorities in acting on the basis of a complaint alleging illegal and unauthorized construction.
3. Pursuant to an order dated 21 April, 2026, the respondent no. 3 has filed a Report dated 25 April, 2026.
2
4. A copy of the report be kept with the records.
5. It appears from the report that after conducting an enquiry the respondent no. 3 has categorically come to a finding that there are three distinct deviations at the subject premises.
6. In view of the above, WPA/550/2026 stands disposed of by directing the concerned statutory respondents to take all corrective and remedial measures in terms of the Report dated 25 April, 2026 within a period of one month from the date of passing of this
order.
7. Liberty is granted to the writ petitioner to file a fresh proceeding in accordance with law, if so advised and if the subsequent events so warrant.
(RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR, J.)