HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11201/2026 URN: CRLMB / 20713U / 2026 1. Kaluram S/o Sohan Lal, Aged 60 Years, R/o Todi Luharan, Police Station Thanagazi, District Alwar, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined In Central Jail Alwar). 2. Failiram @ Phoolchand S/o Sohan Lal, Aged 56 Years, R/o Todi Luharan, Police Station Thanagazi, District Alwar, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined In Central Jail Alwar). 3. Matadeen S/o Sohan Lal, Aged 38 Years, R/o Todi Luharan, Police Station Thanagazi, District Alwar, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined In Central Jail Alwar). 4. Tulsi @ Rohit S/o Kaluram, Aged 24 Years, R/o Todi Luharan, Police Station Thanagazi, District Alwar, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined In Central Jail Alwar). ----Accused-Petitioners Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anubhav Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 20/07/2026 1. This instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioners against the orders passed by learned trial Court dated 16.04.2026 under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.61/2026 registered at Police Station Thanagazi, District Alwar for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 125(a), 126(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) & 329(3) of BNS. (2 of 3) [CRLMB-11201/2026] 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the accused-petitioners are in custody since long. He further submits that charge-sheet has already been filed. He further submits that injury sustained by the injured which is dangerous to life, is attributed to co-accused Narsi; that similar situated co-accused person has already been enlarged on bail; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioners behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the contentions put forth by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioners and submits that there are criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioners. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and rival contentions advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties and particularly keeping in view the fact that accused-petitioners are behind the bars since long; that charge-sheet has already been filed; that injury sustained by the injured which is dangerous to life, is not attributed to accused-petitioners; that similarly situated co-accused person Ganguram has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 08.07.2026 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6512/2026; that trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. (3 of 3) [CRLMB-11201/2026] 6. Therefore, this instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners (i) Kaluram S/o Sohan Lal, (ii) Failiram @ Phoolchand S/o Sohan Lal, (iii) Matadeen S/o Sohan Lal, and (iv) Tulsi @ Rohit S/o Kaluram are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve themselves in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. 8. In case of any breach of the aforementioned condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 9. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 10. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court, Jail authorities through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J 117/SHIVANI