Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10482 (MAD)

Sankarganesh v. The State Rep.by, The Inspector of Police,

CRL OP/7511/2026 · 2026-03-25

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.7511 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 25.03.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Crl.O.P.No.7511 of 2026 Sankaraganesh ... Petitioner Vs. The Inspector of Police, Aadhamangalampudhur Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. Crime No.98 of 2025 ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police in the above Cr.No.98 of 2025 on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.E.Sathiyaraj Elangovan For Respondent : Mr.P.Dhileepan Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 303(2), 326(a) of BNS Act and Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957, in Crime No.98 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.7511 of 2026 2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was found in illegal transportation of 1 unit of river sand in a tractor. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court and hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would reiterate the prosecution case and submit that the petitioner has one previous case. Hence, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner. 5. Considering the fact that petitioner has previous case, this Court is of the view that the petitioner does not deserve anticipatory bail. 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 25.03.2026 sma 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.7511 of 2026 To 1.The Inspector of Police, Aadhamangalampudhur Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.7511 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN.J. sma Crl.O.P.No.7511 of 2026 25.03.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis