HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9538 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard, Mrs. Sadhana Dubey, the Learned counsel for the applicant, the Learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No.137 of 2026, under Sections 3/5A/8 of The Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and Section 4/25 Arms Act, P.S.- Gahmar, District- Ghazipur, with a prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail as the applicant apprehends his arrest in the above-mentioned case. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that three animals stated to be cow or its progeny were recovered from a vehicle bearing registration number UP 61 BT 9053 and the co-accused Arman was arrested by the police. The name of the applicant has surfaced in the statement of co-accused Arman. The applicant is stated to be the owner of the vehicle in question, however, it is the version of the First Information Report itself that the registered owner of the vehicle is one Sunil Yadav. Applicant has a criminal history of one case but is not a previous convict. 4. The Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail but does not dispute the explanation given regarding criminal antecedents by the applicant. 5. I have considered the submissions made by the Learned counsel for the parties and perused the material brought on the record. 6. The applicant was not arrested from the spot. Co-accused Rajesh Yadav whose name has also been disclosed in the confession statement of the co-accused Arman has Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sadhana Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Subash Yadav @ Rajkumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 8882 of 2026. The applicant is not a previous convict. 7. Taking into account all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it fit to enlarge the applicant on anticipatory bail. 8. In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed. 9. In the event of the arrest of the applicant Subash Yadav @ Rajkumar, he shall be released forthwith in the aforesaid case crime on anticipatory bail on furnishing a personal bond and surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station/Court concerned with the following conditions:- i. the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; ii. that the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; iii. that the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court; iv. that the applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witness; 10. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the Court concerned shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. 11. It is made clear that observations made hereinabove are exclusively for deciding the instant anticipatory bail application and are not to be considered to be an opinion on the merits of the case. September 30, 2026 Sachin NABAIL No. 9538 of 2026 2 (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad