Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:HHC:19630 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.7597 of 2026 Decided on: 25.05.2026 Vinta Devi … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________
_
For the petitioner: Mr. Shivom Vashista, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr.Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of respondents. By way of this petition, the petitioner has, inter alia, prayed for the following reliefs:-
“i) That a writ in the nature of mandamus may kindly be issued for directing the Respondents to allow the petitioner to perform his duties in respondent organization upto the age of 60 years i.e. up to 31.05.2028, in view of the judgment rendered by This Hon'ble Court in case of, C.W.P. No.- 2274/2021 titled as Satya Devi Vs. State of H.P. alongwith connected matters decided on 28.05.2024, in the interest of justice.”
2. In light of the fact that the issue raised by the petitioner in this petition is pending adjudication before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, as agreed, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the parties shall abide by the final judgment passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Satya Devi’s case. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge May 25, 2026 (Rishi) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?