Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN TH 145
Bhupinder
Manjit Ka
CORAM:
Present:-
NIDHI GU
CM-4244
certified co learned Ad No.145 of 2
and the af 16.1.2026 Civil Revis
the impugn learned Civ Civil Revision No.283 of 2025 (O & M IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR
Civil Revision N
Date of decision pinder Singh Versus jit Kaur
AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI
Mr. Jatinder Singh, Advocate
Mr. Harjot Singh Bedi, Advoc for the non-applicant/petitione
Mr. Vijay Lath, Advocate for t HI GUPTA J. (Oral) 4244-CII-2026
Prayer in this application i fied copy of judgment and decree d ed Additional District Judge, Fatehg 45 of 28.8.2023 titled as “Bhupinder S
The application is allowed su the aforesaid certified copy of the ju .2026 is taken on record as Annexure A l Revision No.283 of 2025
Prayer in the present revision mpugned order dated 05.11.2024 (An ed Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Fatehgarh
& M) 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH ion No.283 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-30.03.2026 …..Petitioner …..Respondent E NIDHI GUPTA ocate for Advocate titioner. te for the applicant-respondent. tion is for placing on record cree dated 16.1.2026 passed by Fatehgarh Sahib in Civil Appeal inder Singh vs. Manjit Kaur”. ed subject to all just exceptions the judgment and decree dated exure A-1. vision petition is for setting aside 4 (Annexure P-6) passed by the hgarh Sahib in Execution No.143 VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.01 17.34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
of 2023 tit objections
applicant/p been rende learned firs A-1).
the only c noticed in t present rev
disposed o
March 30 Vijay Asija
Whether spea Whether Repo
Civil Revision No.283 of 2025 (O & M 23 titled as “MNjit Kaur vs. Bhupin ctions filed by the petitioner have been
At the very outset, learne cant/petitioner admits that the present rendered infructuous as the main ap d first Appellate Court vide order d
It is submitted by the applica nly contention raised by learned co ed in the order dated 17.1.2025 where nt revision petition.
In view of the above, the p osed of having been rendered infructuo
Pending application(s), if any, 30, 2026
r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No
& M) 2 hupinder Singh” vide which the e been rejected.
learned counsel for the non- present civil revision petition has ain appeal stands decided by the rder dated 16.1.2026 (Annexure pplicant-respondent that this was ed counsel for the petitioner as whereby notice was issued in the the present revision petition is fructuous. if any, shall stand(s) disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.01 17.34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document