Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1047 (KAR)

MR. RANGASWAMY v. MRS.SHILPA @ CHIKKAMMA

MFA/6574/2024 · 2026-02-11

Jayant Banerji, T M Nadaf

Civil Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.6574 OF 2024 BETWEEN MR. RANGASWAMY, S/O LATE. BORAIAH, AGED 42 YEARS, R/AT NO.2664, 4TH BLOCK, VISHVESHWARAIAH LAYOUT, DODDABASTI, BENGALURU. ……..Appellant s (Sri. B.Ravindra Prasad, Vinaya H, Advocates) AND MRS. SHILPA @ CHIKKAMMA, W/O SRI. RANGASWAMY, D/O LATE. BOMMEGOWDA, R/AT ARETIPPUR, C.A. KERE HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT. …….. Respondent MFA.No.6574/2024 ------------------------- 2 This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed U/S. 28(1) of Hindu Marriage Act, against the Judgment and Decree dated 22.02.2024 passed in M.C. No.64/2020 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Maddur dismissing the petition filed under section 13-1(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following: ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the appellant is permitted two weeks and no more time to remove the office objections. Failure to remove the office objections shall result in dismissal of the aforesaid appeal without any further reference to this Court. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE NOTE: Court Order dated.11.02.2026, not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed. COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By: BR R By: NR C By: STE