Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10468 (RAJ)

KEDAR S/O DHARMENRA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/10230/2026 · 2026-07-16

Bipin Gupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:27068] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10230/2026 URN: CRLMB / 18956U / 2026 Kedar S/o Dharmenra, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Dadwada, Police Station Itawa, District Kota, Rajasthan. (Presently Lodged At District Jail, Tonk). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikas Kabra For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 16/07/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 22.06.2026 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, District-Tonk, in Criminal Misc. Case CIS No. 449/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No. 334/2024, Police Station Sadar Tonk, District-Tonk for the offences under Section 3/25 of the Arms (Amendment) Act, 2019. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner of having committed any offence of similar nature or any other nature. He further submits that the FIR is of the year 2024 and he has been falsely implicated merely being the owner of the vehicle where the firearm was seized. [2026:RJ-JP:27068] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10230/2026] 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the conclusion of investigation/trial will take sufficiently long time. Moreover, the maximum punishment is five years and offences are triable by Magistrate, therefore, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail as the accused is in custody since 11.06.2026. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon consideration of the submissions advanced, and particularly the fact that the offences are triable by Magistrate; there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner of having committed any offence of similar nature or any other nature; the conclusion of investigation/trial is likely to take sufficiently long time; the maximum punishment is five years, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application deserves to be accepted. 6. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner namely Kedar S/o Dharmenra arrested in connection with F.I.R. No. 334/2024, Police Station Sadar Tonk, District-Tonk, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court; [2026:RJ-JP:27068] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10230/2026] (ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected; (iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 69/MAHIMA