1 2026:CGHC:3907 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 1300 of 2023 1 - Smt. Usha Khunte W/o Vijaykant Khunte Aged About 27 Years Caste Satnami Resident At Parsabhatha, Tarda, P.S. Urga, Tahsil Kartala, At Present Resident Of Nawagaon, P.S. And Tahsil Balauda, District : Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh 2 - Jyoti Khunte D/o Vijaykant Khunte Aged About 7 Years Minor Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Usha Khunte, W/o Vijaykant Khunte, Caste Satnami Resident At Parsabhatha, Tarda, P.S. Urga, Tahsil Kartala, At Present Resident Of Nawagaon, P.S. And Tahsil Balauda, District : Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh 3 - Atulkant Khunte S/o Vijaykant Khunte Aged About 6 Years Minor Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Usha Khunte, W/o Vijaykant Khunte, Caste Satnami Resident At Parsabhatha, Tarda, P.S. Urga, Tahsil Kartala, At Present Resident Of Nawagaon, P.S. And Tahsil Balauda, District : Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Applicants versus Vijaykant Khunte S/o Ramdayal Khunte Aged About 30 Years Resident At Parsabhatha, Tarda, P.S. Urga, Tahsil Kartala, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ---- Non-applicant For Petitioner : Mr. Pradeep Kumar Jogi, Advocate. For Respondents/State : Mr. Akash Agrawal, Advocate. Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 22.01.2026 1. The applicant has filed this instant revision with the following prayer: “ It is therefore, that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this criminal revision and set-aside impugned order dated 28.10.2023 in respect of case of applicant No. 1 and to grant maintenance amount sought by RAJSHEKHAR SONI Digitally signed by RAJSHEKHAR SONI 2 the applicants in application under section 125 Cr.P.C. for respondent no. 1 and may also be enhanced the granting maintenance amount of applicants no. 2 and 3 as per such application under section 125 of Cr. P. C., in the interest of justice. ” 2. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the instant bail application has become infructuous, as the matter has been settled and compromise has already been executed between the parties. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that he has no knowledge about the said compromise. 4. In view of the submissions raised by learned counsel for the applicants, the instant revision is dismissed as infructuous without any further liberty. 5. Let a certified copy of this order as well as the original records, be transmitted to the concerned trial Court for necessary compliance and follow up action, if any. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rajshekhar