Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10467 (ALL)

SANTOSH KUMAR KESHARI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 7 OTHERS

WRIC/38418/2026 · 2026-09-29

Ajit Kumar, Garima Prashad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 38418 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for following relief: "i). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No. 3 and 4 to ensure full protection of the petitioners' legal title and physical possession over Gata No. 295/1 and Gata No. 299/1 (total area 0.0559 hectare) situated at Mauza Jagdishpur, Tehsil Karchhana, District Prayagraj forthwith." 3. In our considered view, the relief is in the nature of injunction arising out of a pure civil dispute which may involve disputed questions of fact and hence, petitioner may avail remedy of civil suit, if so advised. Accordingly, we decline to grant indulgence in the matter. 4. Subject to aforesaid liberty, this petition is consigned to records. September 30, 2026 Sanjeev Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajendra Kumar Ojha, Shiv Kumar Kesari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Santosh Kumar Keshari And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANJEEV RANJAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad