1 2026:CGHC:19352 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3617 of 2026 1 - Amrita Turkel D/o - Late Rajesh Turkel Aged About 37 Years R/o - Prabhat Chowk, Chingrajpara, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Urban Administration And Development Department, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Municipal Corporation Through Commissioner, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Commissioner Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh -- Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from CIS system) For Petitioner : Mr. Saket Pandey, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Suyashdhar Badgaiya, G.A. For Respondents No.2 and 3 : Mr. Aniruddha Shrivastava on behalf of Mr. S.S. Baghel, Advocate SB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 27/04/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this petition seeking following relief (s) :- “10.1 That, the records pertaining to the case of the petitioner, may be kindly called for the kind perusal of this Hon’ble Court. 10.2 That, the Hon’ble court may kindly direct the respondent authorities to decide the representations/applications of the petitioner for grant of compassionate appointment, in the interest of justice. BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN 2 10.3 That any other relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that at this stage, petitioner is not pressing this petition on merits and only seeking a direction to respondents No.2 and 3 to consider and take decision on the representation submitted by petitioner for grant of compassionate appointment. 3. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondents No.2 and 3 opposes the submission of learned counsel for petitioner. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. As petitioner has already submitted representation and according to him, representation was not considered and decided, therefore, I find it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition at this stage directing respondents No.2 and 3 to take decision on the representation submitted by petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within further period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. 6. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with aforesaid observations and directions. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram