APHC010256812026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1891 OF 2026 Between: 1. PSR Constructions,, Rep. by its Managing Director, Sri K. Madhava Rao, S/o. Late Pedda Malakondaiah, Aged about 43 years, R/o. Darakanipadu Village, Gudlur Mandal, Prakasam district. ...Petitioner AND 1. Sri G Sai Prasad IAS, Fathers name and age not known to the petitioner Principal Secretary. Irrigation Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. Sri Peeyush Kumar IAS, Fathers name and age not known to the petitioner Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Secretariat, Velgapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. ...Respondents Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to call the contemnors herein and to punish them under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for willful disobedience and deliberately violating the orders passed by this Honble Court in W.P. No. 6638 of 2025, dated 16-09-2025 and to pass 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: VENKAT SAILENDRA G Counsel for the Respondents: NAGARAJU PULLAGURA Counsel for the Respondents:SOMA RAJU YELISETTI The Court made the following 3 ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed for willful violation of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.6638 of 2025 on 16.09.2025, wherein this Court passed the following order: “….this Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to make the said payments as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six (06) months, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order....…” 2. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms.S.Akhila, learned counsel representing Mr.Venkat Sailendra.G, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order dated 16.09.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.6638 of 2025 has been complied with by the respondents. Therefore, requested this Court to close the contempt case. 3. Recording the above submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 11.09.2026 KGR