Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10457 (BOM)

BHAU POSHA CHOUDHARY AND ORS v. HIRU PADU HATHMODE SINCE DEC THR HIS LEGAL HEIRS AND ORS

WP/7173/2025 · 2026-09-17

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7173 OF 2025 Shri Bhau Posha Choudhary & Ors. .... Petitioners Vs. Shri. Hiru Padu Hathmode .... Respondents (since deceased) thru legal heirs Smt. Hirabai Nana Mundhe & Ors. Mr. Prashant Yadav, for Petitioners. Ernest Tuscano a/w Mark Dbritto for Respondent nos. 1.1, 1.2, 1.5, 1.6 and 1.7. Ms. Savina R. Crasto, AGP for State. CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 17th September 2026 P.C. : 1. Learned counsel for the Respondents submits that the impugned order in revision is maintainable before the State. 2. Learned AGP also confirms the same. 3. In view of the judgment of the Supreme Court, in the case of Gurudassing Nawoosing Panjwani Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.1, the Second Revision is maintainable before the State. 4. The Writ Petition is disposed of with liberty to the Petitioners to challenge the impugned order before the State in a Second Revision. [ ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ] 1 (2016) 2 SCC 213 1/1 43 WP 7173.25.doc Dusane