Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10456 (KAR)

SRI SHIVANNA K v. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA @ LAKSHAMMA

CRL.RP/437/2026 · 2026-04-23

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:24220 CRL.RP No. 437 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 437 OF 2026 BETWEEN: SRI. SHIVANNA K, S/O LATE KUNTAPPA @ KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.KL.46/1, 1ST CROSS, (BESIDE BISILU MARAMMA TEMPLE), V.V NAGARA, KALLAHALLI, MANDYA CITY, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 401, …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ADINARAYANAPPA., ADVOCATE) AND: SMT.LAKSHMAMMA @ LAKSHAMMA, W/O P. CHANNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT KT-209/146, CHALANA, 1ST CROSS, MARIGOWDA LAYOUT, MANDYA CITY, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 401. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. ANIL KUMAR B.S., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. AKARSH KUMAR GOWDA., ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 CR.PC (FILED U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:24220 CRL.RP No. 437 of 2026 IMPUGNED ORDER ON DATED:-24/02/2026 PASSED ON APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 432 OF BNSS IN CRL.APL.NO.257/2025 PENDING BEFORE THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE AT MANDYA. WHICH ARE PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE A AND F AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER 1. Heard Sri. Adinarayanappa, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri. Anil Kumar for Sri. Akarsh Kumar Gowda, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. Accused is the revision petitioner challenging the Order passed by the learned Judge in the First Appellate Court allowing the application filed by him to lead the additional evidence with a condition that 50% of the cheque amount shall be deposited. 3. Admittedly, said order is in the discretionary powers of the learned Judge in the First Appellate Court. 4. This Court does not find any good reasons to interfere with the impugned order as it is interlocutory in - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:24220 CRL.RP No. 437 of 2026 nature and revision petition is not maintainable against such order. 5. Accordingly, following order: ORDER Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SNC List No.: 2 Sl No.: 47