Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10455 (KAR)

SRI. NATARAJA N., v. THE COMMISSIONER

WP/25892/2025 · 2026-03-23

S R Krishna Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16326 WP No. 25892 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 25892 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. NATARAJA N., SON OF NARASIMHAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS RESIDING AT # 58, 1ST B CROSS 5TH BLOCK, BSK 3RD STAGE, BENGALURU – 560 085 PRESNTLY WORKING AS ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER EARLIER GIRINAGARA NOW CALLED AS VIDYAPEETA SUB DIVISION, BANGALORE – 560 085 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PUNITH C., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BENGALUR MAHANAGARA PALIKE N. R. SQUARE, BANGALORE PINCODE – 560 001 2. THE SPECIAL COMMISSIONER (ADMIN) BRUHAT BENGALUR MAHANAGARA PALIKE N. R. SQUARE, BANGALORE PINCODE – 560 001 3. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (ADMIN) BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE N. R. SQUARE, BANGALORE PINCODE – 560 001 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B. L. SANJEEV, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3) Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16326 WP No. 25892 of 2025 THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD 21.08.25 VIDE B12(6)PR/E-159426/25-26 AS PER ANNX- D PASSED BY THE RESPONDENTS NO.3 AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 23.03.2026, which reads as under: “That the petitioner was protected by this Hon’ble Court on 23.08.2025 and in view of the subsequent events and formation of Greater Bengaluru authority, a fresh appointment has been given to the petitioner and he is discharging his duties in the subsequent post. Hence, this writ petition does not survive for consideration.” 2. The aforesaid memo is placed on record. 3. In view of the aforesaid memo, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE BMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 79