Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10454 (JHR)

AMIT KUMAR ALIAS AMIT KUMAR DAS ALLIAS AMIT DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./11067/2025 · 2026-02-17

Gautam Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:4546 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 11067 of 2025 ------ Amit Kumar @ Amit Kumar Das @ Amit Das, S/o Late Bishnu Ravidas @ Doman Ravidas, R/o Lohanda, PO & PS-Jirwabari, District-Sahibganj .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Santosh Kumar Jha, Advocate Mr. Mahavir Pd. Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Mahto, APP ------ Order No.03 / Dated : 17.02.2026. Heard both the sides. This bail application has been filed on behalf of Amit Kumar @ Amit Kumar Das @ Amit Das who is in custody since 23.07.2025 in connection with Jirwabari P.S. Case No. 207 of 2024 for the offence registered under Sections 103(1), 238 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 pending in the Court of CJM, Sahibganj, is pressed into motion. It is submitted by the learned counsel on behalf of petitioner that FIR is lodged against one named accused person and he is not named in the FIR. The only material against him is the confessional statement of the co-accused. Neither there is direct eye witness nor circumstantial evidence against him Learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that there is no other witness except the confessional statement of the co-accused. However, from para 88 of the supplementary case diary, it appears that on his disclosure statement the Gamcha that was used for strangulating the deceased was recovered. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for bail of the petitioner, is hereby, rejected. (Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Pawan/ Uploaded 18.02.2026