Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10452 (ALL)

SHIV KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

WPIL/2331/2026 · 2026-09-29

Arun Kumar

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2331 of 2026 Court No. - 51 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has not filed his personal affidavit in support of the averments made in the writ petition as contemplated under Chapter XXII Rule 1 (3- A) of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952. 2. Faced with the aforesaid objection, learned counsel for the petitioner comes up with the prayer to withdraw this petition with liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars, supported with affidavit of petitioner as per aforementioned Rules. 3. In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. September 30, 2026 Ranjeet Sahu Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhimanuy Yadav, Dhiraj Kumar, Ray Sahab Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sudhir Bharti (Arun Kumar,J.) Shiv Kumar Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RANJEET SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad