Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10449 (CHH)

AUTHORISED OFFICER v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/6673/2025 · 2026-03-01

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:10655 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 6673 of 2025 Authorised Officer Au Small Finance Bank Ltd. Branch Third Floor, Skai Park, Near Bhatiya Hospital Kenal Road, Raja Talab Raipur, Raipur Chhattisgarh Through Its Manager Dheeraj Pandey, S/o Vivekanand Pandey, Aged About 44 Years, Branch Office - 3rd Floor, Sky Plaza, Gaurav Path, Near Banthia Hospital, Raja Talab, Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner. Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan New Mantralaya Naya Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Colllector Durg, District Durg (C.G.) 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Rev) Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh 4 - Additional Tahsildar Tahsil Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh 5 - P.M. Foot Company Pro. Mahendra Kumar R/o House No. 123/2, Ward No. 26, Surya Nagar, Camp-2, Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh 6 - Smt. Rupa Sonakar W/o Shri Mahendra Kumar R/o House No. 123/2, Ward No. 26, Surya Nagar, Camp-2, Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh 7 - Mahendra Kumar Sonkar S/o Shri Pabbar Sonkar R/o House No. 123/2, Digitally signed by AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI DN: cn=AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, ou=HIGH COURT, o=HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, st=Chhattisgarh, c=IN Date: 2026.03.03 10:26:28 +0530 2 Ward No. 26, Surya Nagar, Camp-2, Bhilai, Tahsil And District Durg Chhattisgarh ... Respondents. (cause title downloaded from CIS Periphery) For Petitioners : Mr. Pawan Kumar Kashyap, Advocate. For State : Dr. Arham Siddiqui, PL. (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi ) Order on Board 02/03/2026 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed, therefore, he does not want to pursue the case further. 2. Learned State counsel has not opposed the aforesaid submission. 3. Having regard to the aforesaid submission, this writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Ajay