Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10449 (AP)

Kuchi Venkatsawrlu, v. K. Sunitha Garu, IAS

CC/1087/2026 · 2026-09-18

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010132282026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] SATURDAY, THE 19th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1087/2026 Between: 1. KUCHI VENKATSAWRLU,, S/O. KUCHI VENKATA SWAMY (LATE), AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC. FARMER R/O D.NO.7-27, KATTAKRINDAPALLI VILLAGE, DUTTALUR MANDAL SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, A.P.-52422 ...PETITIONER A N D 1. K SUNITHA GARU IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, EBC WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VEIAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, PINCODE. 522237. 2. PEEYUSH KUMAR GARU IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VEIAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, PINCODE. 522237. 3. DR A MALLIKARJUNA GARU IAS, THE DIRECTOR (FAC), BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT, TADIGADAPA, OPPOSITE SIDDARTHA COLLEGE VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court Act, for their willful disobedience of the order of this Honble Court dated 11.09.2025 in W.P. No. 33467 of 2023 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MUDE SAI KUMAR NAIK SRK, J C.C.No.1087 of 2026 2 Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. The Court made the following: SRK, J C.C.No.1087 of 2026 3 O R D E R The Contempt Case has been filed under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 seeking the Court to punish the respondents for willfully and deliberately violating the Order, dated 11.09.2025 passed in Writ Petition No.33467 of 2023. 2. Today, when the matter has come up before this Court, learned counsel for the petitioner represented that the Order dated 11.09.2025 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.33467 of 2023 has been complied with, and no further orders are required in the present case. 3. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 4. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Contempt Case, shall stand closed. ___ __________ JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY 11th September, 2026. DNB/GSN