IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2453 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-141 Year-2025 Thana- MAHINDWARA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Bholu Kumar @ Sushant Singh S/o Sanjiv Singh @ Sanjiv Kumar Singh R/o village - Basudeo, P.S - Mahindwara (Runni Saidpur), District - Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 3106 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-141 Year-2025 Thana- MAHINDWARA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Kanhaiya Kumar @ Kanhaiya Kumar Singh S/O Jaishankar Singh R/O Village- Basudeo, P.S- Mahindwara, Distt.- Sitamarhi (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 2453 of 2026) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.N.K.Aggarwal, Sr. Advocate Mr.Uday Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rajendra Nath Jha, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 3106 of 2026) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.N.K.Aggarwal, Sr. Advocate Mr.Uday Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Syed Ehteshamuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 5 09-04-2026 Heard learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Mahindwara P.S. Case No. 141/2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 309 (b), 109 (1) & 3(5) of the B.N.S. 3. As per the prosecution case, three armed persons robbed the informant of his motorcycle, jewellery and mobile Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2453 of 2026(5) dt.09-04-2026 2/2 phone and fired upon him. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner and informant are from the same village and there is a dispute with regard to the jewellery and therefore, the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he is in custody since 05.09.2025. The petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the case/ trial. 5. Learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant have jointly opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this application for regular bail is allowed. 7. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Sitamarhi /concerned Court below in connection with Mahindwara P.S. Case No. 141/2025. tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T