MADHU KUMARI ALIAS MADHU DEVI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./11887/2025 · 2026-03-17
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10448 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10448 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. ( 2026:JHHC:7256 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 11887 of 2025
Madhu Kumari @ Madhu Devi
... … Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party
---------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
---------
For the Petitioner : Mr. P.S. Dayal, Advocate
For the State : Spl. P.P.
---------
03/17.03.2026 Heard Mr. P.S. Dayal, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Spl. P.P. for the State.
The petitioner is an accused in connection with Pathalgadda P.S. Case No. 24 of 2025.
It has been alleged that the house of the petitioner was searched and 3.821 Kg. of brown sugar, 2.784 Kg. of opium and cash of Rs.23,60,700/- were recovered.
It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that on the confession of the petitioner the house of one Roshan Dangi was searched and huge quantity of cash was recovered and the confessional statement of Roshan Dangi revealed that the cash and opium was kept by the wife of Roshan Dangi in the house of Ruby Devi. It has also been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since
12.06.2025.
Learned Spl. P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Regard being had to the huge quantity of brown sugar recovered apart from the cash, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The same stands rejected.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)
Dated, the 17th March, 2026 A. Sanga/- Uploaded on 18 /03/2026