31-WP-9030-2022(C).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9030 OF 2022 Maruti Chandrakant Lad And Others ...Petitioners. Versus The State of Maharashtra and Others ...Respondents. —————— Mr. Anand S. Patil a/w Mr. Soham V. Powar a/w Mr. Pratik B. Bhakare, for the Petitioners. Ms. Tejas J. Kapre, AGP for the Respondent-State. —————— Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh & Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ. Date : September 22, 2026. P. C. : 1. Learned counsel for Petitioners would submit that though several reliefs are sought, the petitioners confine their grievance to non-consideration of the Petitioners’ representations for allotting the vacant plots in Gat No.62 for the purpose of common amenity space to the present Petitioners, who were rehabilitated as project-affected persons in Gat No. 62. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners submits that, various representations were made for allotment of common amenity space, which have not been considered. 3. Considering the limited grievance, the Petition is disposed of by directing the Respondent No.4 to decide the representations, if not, already decided. Jamadar - SL 1 of 2 2026:BHC-KOL:9115-DB 31-WP-9030-2022(C).doc 4. It is clarified that this Court has not gone into the merits of the matter, and the representation to be decided strictly in accordance with law. [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.] [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.] Jamadar - SL 2 of 2