HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9380 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record. 2. A Short Counter Affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant today is taken on record. 3. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No. 195 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 109(1), 131, 118(1) of BNS, P.S. Khandauli, District Agra, with a prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail as the applicant apprehend his arrest in the abovementioned case. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. He is not named in the FIR. His name has been disclosed in the statements of the injured witnesses. The general role of assault has been assigned to the applicant. Specific role of using a sharp edged weapon (scissors) of assaulting Uttam and Yash has been given to co accused Satyam. Learned counsel for the applicant has further submitted that applicant has no criminal antecedent. 5. Learned counsel for the informant has submitted that the applicant had participated in the incident. He had also assaulted the injured. Although, the sharp edged weapon has been assigned Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manoj Mishra, Shashank Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Vikash Kumar, G.A. Aman Pratap .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) to co accused Satyam, however, there are other injuries present on the person of the injured, which indicates active participation of the applicant. Learned counsel for the informant has further submitted that the father of the injured, who is the informant, did not know the accused persons and it is only after medical aid was provided to the injured that they were able to disclose the name of the actual assailants. 6. I have considered the submissions made by the Learned counsels for the parties. 7. The applicant is not named in the FIR. Even in the statements of the injured, a general role has been assigned to the applicant. Specific role of using a pair of scissors has been given to Satyam. Grievous injuries were inflicted by Satyam. The case of the applicant stands on a separate footing from that of co accused Satyam (not named in the FIR) and Kanha, who is named in the FIR. 8. Taking note of the entire facts and circumstances of the case, especially the fact that the applicant has no repeated criminal antecedents, I deem it appropriate to enlarge applicants on anticipatory bail. 9. In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed. 10. In the event of the arrest of the applicant- Aman Pratap, he shall be released forthwith in the aforesaid case crime on anticipatory bail on furnishing of his personal bond and surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station/Court concerned with the following conditions:- i. the applicant shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; ii. that the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the NABAIL No. 9380 of 2026 2 facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; iii. that the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court; iv. that the applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witness; 11. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the Court concerned shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. October 1, 2026 RavindraKSingh NABAIL No. 9380 of 2026 3 (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVINDRA KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad