Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10444 (RAJ)

MOSIM HUSAIN S/O JAKIR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/9953/2026 · 2026-07-17

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:27335] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 9953/2026 URN: CRLMB / 18451U / 2026 Mosim Husain S/o Jakir, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Ward No. 19, Nayi Abadi Botalganj, Police Station Pipaliya Mandi, Distt. Mandsaur (Madhya Pradesh). (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined Sub Jail Malpura). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Raj Bala For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 17/07/2026 1. The instant second bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No.127/2025 registered at Police Station Lambaharisingh, District Tonk for the offences under Sections 3, 5, 6 and & of the Rajasthan Bovine Animal (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration or Export) Act, 1995 and Section 11(1)(D) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material made available on record. [2026:RJ-JP:27335] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9953/2026] 4. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 09.11.2025 and the trial of the case is likely to take considerable time. She further submits that the co-accused of the present case has already been enlarged on bail by the this Court on 22.05.2026 (S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.7121/2026. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Having regard to the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the allegation against the accused-petitioner and the fact that he is in custody since 09.11.2025, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 7. Accordingly, the second bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner named above shall be enlarged on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J 5/Ashish Kumar